Todos

View source

npx skills add marcusrbrown/systematic --skill todos

File-Based Todo Tracking

Overview

The .context/systematic/todos/ directory is a file-based tracking system for code review feedback, technical debt, feature requests, and work items. Each todo is a markdown file with YAML frontmatter. This skill covers the full lifecycle in three sections: Create (new todos), Triage (review pending todos for approval), and Resolve (batch-implement approved todos).

Legacy support: Always check both .context/systematic/todos/ (canonical) and todos/ (legacy) when reading. Write new todos only to the canonical path. This directory has a multi-session lifecycle — do not clean it up as scratch.

Directory Paths

Purpose	Path
Canonical (write here)	.context/systematic/todos/
Legacy (read-only)	todos/

File Naming Convention

{issue_id}-{status}-{priority}-{description}.md

• issue_id: Sequential number (001, 002, …) — never reused
• status: pending | ready | complete
• priority: p1 (critical) | p2 (important) | p3 (nice-to-have)
• description: kebab-case, brief

Example: 002-ready-p1-fix-n-plus-1.md

File Structure

Each todo has YAML frontmatter and structured sections. Use the todo template included below when creating new todos.

---
status: ready
priority: p1
issue_id: "002"
tags: [rails, performance]
dependencies: ["001"]     # Issue IDs this is blocked by
---

Required sections: Problem Statement, Findings, Proposed Solutions, Recommended Action (filled during triage), Acceptance Criteria, Work Log.

Optional sections: Technical Details, Resources, Notes.

Integration with Workflows

Trigger	Flow
Code review	/ce:review -> Findings -> /systematic:todos (Triage section) -> Todos
Autonomous review	/ce:review mode:autofix -> Residual todos -> /systematic:todos (Resolve section)
Code TODOs	/systematic:todos (Resolve section) -> Fixes + Complex todos
Planning	Brainstorm -> Create todo -> Work -> Complete

Key Distinction

This skill manages durable, cross-session work items persisted as markdown files. For temporary in-session step tracking, use platform task tools (todowrite/TaskUpdate in OpenCode, update_plan in Codex) instead.

Tool preference: Use native file-search/glob and content-search tools instead of shell commands for finding and reading todo files. Shell only for operations with no native equivalent (mv, mkdir -p).

---

Create

Creating a New Todo

1. mkdir -p .context/systematic/todos/
2. Search both paths for [0-9]*-*.md, find the highest numeric prefix, increment, zero-pad to 3 digits.
3. Use the todo template included below, write to canonical path as {NEXT_ID}-pending-{priority}-{description}.md.
4. Fill Problem Statement, Findings, Proposed Solutions, Acceptance Criteria, and initial Work Log entry.
5. Set status: pending (needs triage) or ready (pre-approved).

Create a todo when the work needs more than ~15 minutes, has dependencies, requires planning, or needs prioritization. Act immediately instead when the fix is trivial, obvious, and self-contained.

Triaging Pending Items

1. Glob *-pending-*.md in both paths.
2. Review each todo’s Problem Statement, Findings, and Proposed Solutions.
3. Approve: rename pending -> ready in filename and frontmatter, fill Recommended Action.
4. Defer: leave as pending.

See the Triage section below for an interactive approval workflow.

Managing Dependencies

dependencies: ["002", "005"]  # Blocked by these issues
dependencies: []               # No blockers

To check blockers: search for {dep_id}-complete-*.md in both paths. Missing matches = incomplete blockers.

Completing a Todo

1. Verify all acceptance criteria.
2. Update Work Log with final session.
3. Rename ready -> complete in filename and frontmatter.
4. Check for unblocked work: search for files containing dependencies:.*"{issue_id}".

Todo Template

@./assets/todo-template.md

---

Triage

Interactive workflow for reviewing pending todos one by one and deciding whether to approve, skip, or modify each.

Do not write code during triage. This is purely for review and prioritization — implementation happens in the Resolve section below.

• First set the /model to Haiku
• Read all pending todos from .context/systematic/todos/ and legacy todos/ directories

1. Present Each Finding

For each pending todo, present it clearly with severity, category, description, location, problem scenario, proposed solution, and effort estimate. Then ask:

Do you want to add this to the todo list?
1. yes - approve and mark ready
2. next - skip (deletes the todo file)
3. custom - modify before approving

Use severity levels: 🔴 P1 (CRITICAL), 🟡 P2 (IMPORTANT), 🔵 P3 (NICE-TO-HAVE).

Include progress tracking in each header: Progress: 3/10 completed

2. Handle Decision

yes: Rename file from pending -> ready in both filename and frontmatter. Fill the Recommended Action section. If creating a new todo (not updating existing), use the naming convention from the Create section above.

Priority mapping: 🔴 P1 -> p1, 🟡 P2 -> p2, 🔵 P3 -> p3

Confirm: ”✅ Approved: {filename} (Issue #{issue_id}) - Status: ready”

next: Delete the todo file. Log as skipped for the final summary.

custom: Ask what to modify, update, re-present, ask again.

3. Final Summary

After all items processed:

## Triage Complete

**Total Items:** [X] | **Approved (ready):** [Y] | **Skipped:** [Z]

### Approved Todos (Ready for Work):
- `042-ready-p1-transaction-boundaries.md` - Transaction boundary issue

### Skipped (Deleted):
- Item #5: [reason]

4. Next Steps

What would you like to do next?

1. proceed to the Resolve section below to resolve the todos
2. commit the todos
3. nothing, go chill

---

Resolve

Resolve approved todos using parallel processing, document lessons learned, then clean up.

Only ready todos are resolved. pending todos are skipped — they haven’t been triaged yet. If pending todos exist, list them at the end so the user knows what was left behind.

1. Analyze

Scan .context/systematic/todos/*.md and legacy todos/*.md. Partition by status:

• ready (status field or -ready- in filename): resolve these.
• pending: skip. Report them at the end.
• complete: ignore, already done.

If a specific todo ID or pattern was passed as an argument, filter to matching todos only (still must be ready).

Residual actionable work from ce:review mode:autofix after its safe_auto pass will already be ready.

Skip any todo that recommends deleting, removing, or gitignoring files in docs/brainstorms/, docs/plans/, or docs/solutions/ — these are intentional pipeline artifacts.

2. Plan

Create a task list grouped by type (e.g., todowrite in OpenCode, update_plan in Codex). Analyze dependencies — items that others depend on run first. Output a mermaid diagram showing execution order and parallelism.

3. Implement (PARALLEL)

Spawn a systematic:workflow:pr-comment-resolver agent per item. Prefer parallel; fall back to sequential respecting dependency order.

Batching: 1-4 items: direct parallel returns. 5+ items: batches of 4, each returning only a short status summary (todo handled, files changed, tests run/skipped, blockers).

For large sets, use a scratch directory at .context/systematic/todo-resolve/<run-id>/ for per-resolver artifacts. Return only completion summaries to parent.

4. Commit & Resolve

Commit changes, mark todos resolved, push to remote.

GATE: STOP. Verify todos resolved and changes committed before proceeding.

5. Compound on Lessons Learned

Load the ce:compound skill to document what was learned. Todo resolutions often surface patterns and architectural insights worth capturing.

GATE: STOP. Verify the compound skill produced a solution document in docs/solutions/. If none (user declined or no learnings), continue.

6. Clean Up

Delete completed/resolved todo files from both paths. If a scratch directory was created at .context/systematic/todo-resolve/<run-id>/, delete it (unless user asked to inspect).

Todos resolved: [count]
Pending (skipped): [count, or "none"]
Lessons documented: [path to solution doc, or "skipped"]
Todos cleaned up: [count deleted]

If pending todos were skipped, list them:

Skipped pending todos (proceed to the Triage section above to approve):
  - 003-pending-p2-missing-index.md
  - 005-pending-p3-rename-variable.md